|
Marked by the famous--and widely criticized, also in
the book under discussion here--Women Who Run With
The Wolves (Estes 1990), the general conception of
this approach can be encapsulated as saying: women
have preserved something that men, and hence humankind,
seem to have lost. |
The general conception of this approach, marked by the
famous and widely criticized book, Women Who Run
with the Wolves (Estes 1990), also criticized in
the book under discussion here, is that women have
preserved something that men, and hence humankind,
seem to have lost. |
|
The academic or scholarly reader, hoping to find the
book useful in her research, might on her side feel
uncomfortable with the style, with a large part of the
authors Jones founds her claims on, as well as with
some of her conclusions. |
The academic or scholarly reader who hopes to find the
book useful for research might feel uncomfortable with
the style, the large number of authors serving as the
basis of Jones’s claims, and some of her conclusions. |
|
It is reaffirmed now that the second edition has also
been published (1999). There are a number of reasons
one might give for believing it. |
Now with the second edition published in 1999, one
might give a number of reasons for reaffirming that
status. |
|
Their
dependencies have often meant they need to focus
primarily on relations with the people who can assist
them in care. There are also sociability challenges
for people who are communication or mobility impaired
when living in non-adapted environments. |
Not only have their
dependencies often meant they need to focus primarily
on relations with the people who can assist them in
care, but also people with communication or mobility
impairments confront social challenges when living in
nonadapted environments. |
